Linear logo
Productivity

Linear

Modern issue tracking and project management for engineering teams

What it does

Linear is issue tracking and project management built specifically for software teams. Keyboard-driven, opinionated, extremely fast. Core primitives are Issues, Projects, Cycles (sprints), and Roadmaps, organized under Teams. Its opinionated defaults - required states, cycle-based planning, deep GitHub and Slack integrations - are the point. It is the Jira replacement that engineers actually want to use and product managers can live with.

Free tier

Yes

Starts at

$8/mo

Setup

easy

Key features

IssuesCyclesProjectsRoadmapsGit IntegrationTriageAPI

Integrates with

GitHub, GitLab, Slack, Figma, Sentry, Zapier

Who this fits

  • B2B SaaS engineering teams (1-100 devs) shipping product weekly
  • Startups that want structure without the bureaucracy of Jira
  • Product-led orgs where PM, design, and eng all live in the tracker
  • Teams doing continuous cycles / sprints (Linear's core loop)
  • Agencies with a dedicated engineering practice serving software clients

Who it does NOT fit

  • Non-software teams (marketing, ops, sales) - Linear's model is issue-shaped, not campaign-shaped
  • Trades, real estate, medspa, restaurants - completely wrong tool
  • Enterprise orgs with 500+ engineers requiring deep permissioning and portfolio management (Jira is still the fit)
  • Teams that need Gantt-heavy project planning with resource management
  • Waterfall or long-cycle project work

Pricing

- Free: unlimited members, 250 issues per team, 2 teams, basic integrations - Standard: ~$8-10/user/mo, unlimited issues, unlimited teams, cycles, roadmaps, GitHub, Slack, Figma - Business: ~$14-16/user/mo, triage, private teams, SAML SSO, custom views, admin API - Enterprise: custom, SCIM, audit log, advanced security, dedicated support - Linear removed the old free-tier issue cap several times; today's cap is 250 issues per team on Free. Verify.

Real gotchas

  • Linear is opinionated - custom workflows are limited by design. Teams that need many custom states or approvals struggle. This is a known design trade-off Linear's founders have publicly defended in blog posts and Hacker News threads
  • No native time tracking. Third-party integrations exist (Toggl, Everhour) but agencies often bounce off this
  • No Gantt view. Roadmap is milestone-based, not resource-based
  • Public issue sharing is limited; not a good customer-facing feedback portal (use Canny or Featurebase)
  • Data export via API is complete but not one-click; migration to or from Linear needs planning
  • Free plan is generous but the 250 issues per team cap sneaks up on active teams

Integrations that matter

GitHub, GitLab, Slack, Figma, Sentry, Zendesk, Intercom, Front, Notion, Loom, Zapier, Discord, Vercel, CircleCI, PagerDuty, Airbyte, custom webhooks, Cursor / Claude Code MCP.

Otto’s take on this tool

Recommend Linear when: user is a software team, business_size is 2-100, and they want a fast, opinionated tracker. Highest fit for B2B SaaS engineering and product teams. Pairs with GitHub, Slack, Figma, and Sentry. Do NOT recommend for non-software teams (Asana, ClickUp, Monday), for trades or field service, for large enterprises that need Jira's flexibility, or for agencies whose bread-and-butter is time-tracked billable hours. Flag the "opinionated by design" point up front - teams that fight it will churn.

Affiliate disclosure: if you sign up through the link above, Ottomately may earn a referral commission at no cost to you. We only feature tools we have actually used or vetted through our recommendation engine.

More in Productivity

Not Sure Linear is Right?

Otto can pick for you.

30 seconds, one form, get a personalized stack with pricing and integration paths.

Get my recommendations